Comparison of Final Results Using Combination AHP-VIKOR And AHP-SAW Methods In Performance Assessment (Case Imanuel Lurang Congregation)

Devi Valentino Waas(1*), I Gede Iwan Sudipa(2), I Putu Agus Eka Darma Udayana(3),

(1) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(2) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(3) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Determination of the final result in determining the decision is to determine the best alternative from several existing alternatives based on several predetermined criteria. The criteria are measures, rules, or standards for making decisions. It can be done by combining several Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods such as AHP, VIKOR, SAW, TOPSIS, and others to get the best decision results. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is one of the MCDM methods with advantages at the criteria weighting stage. It uses a consistency test to see whether the weights obtained are consistent. In comparison, the VIKOR and SAW methods are also of MCDM methods but do not apply the weighting consistency test. With the advantages and disadvantages of each MCDM method, it is possible to combine several existing methods to provide better solutions or alternatives. This study compares the ranking results between the combination of the AHP-VIKOR method and the combination of the AHP-SAW method in a performance appraisal case study. The AHP method is used to weight the criteria and sub-criteria, while the VIKOR and SAW methods are used in the alternative ranking process. The test results show differences in the alternative ranking results between the two combinations of MCDM methods used.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A dan Wardoyo, R., “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM)”. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, (2006).

Mardani A, Zavadskas E K, Govindan K, Senin AA, Jusoh A., “VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability”. 8(37), (2016.), pp. 1-38.

Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P, Bansal RC. 2017. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.69: 596-609.

Tseng, G.H. dan Huang, J.J, “Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications”, CRC Press. Boca Raton, (2011).

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

Saaty, T. L and Vargas, L. G., “Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Boston, MA: Springer US., Second Edi., vol 175 (2012).

V. A. Permadi, R. P. Agusdin, S. P. Tahalea, and W. Kaswidjanti, “Identification of Student Area of Interest using Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods (Case Study: Information System Major, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional" Veteran" Yogyakarta),” in Proceeding of LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta Conference Series 2020–Engineering and Science Series, 2020, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 420–428.

I. G. I. Sudipa, P. Sugiartawan, and I. K. A. G. Wiguna, “Modification Weight Criteria With Webbed Model For Selection Artist Music Festival Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 16, no. 1.

Alonso, J. A. dan Lamata, M. T., Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 14, no. 4, (2006) pp. 445-459.

Opricovic, S and Tzeng, G. H., “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: Acomparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 156, no 2, (2004), pp. 445-455.

Sudipa, I.G.I., “Decision Support System dengan metode AHP, SAW dan ROC untuk penentuan pemberian beasiswa (studi kasus: STMIK STIKOM INDONESIA)”, Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan komputer, Vol. 4 No.1, (2018).

I. G. I. Sudipa et al., “Application of MCDM using PROMETHEE II Technique in the Case of Social Media Selection for Online Businesses.,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 835, no. 1, p. 12059.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v5i5.185

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.







Jumlah Kunjungan:

View My Stats

Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By: