Designing The Concept of Innovation Profiling with Case Study

Indra Gamayanto(1*), Sasono Wibowo(2), Florentina Esti Nilawati(3),

(1) Dian Nuswantoro University (UDINUS)
(2) Dian Nuswantoro University (UDINUS)
(3) Dian Nuswantoro University (UDINUS)
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Innovation is very important in developing a smart city. Therefore, Innovation must be flexible to be applied when developing an area. We must not look only at one side in developing Innovation; Innovation must be broader than it should be and can provide significant changes in others' lives. This article is a long-term process, where this is gradual research, starting from a concept that will then be continued on a prototype and an application to measure a smart city's performance. The main problem is that there are still gaps and difficulties in understanding and implementing innovations. A definite basic concept is needed to execute Innovation right on target. In this article, the method used is from previous research, some formula from smart city 5.0. Moreover, this article's results are the basic concepts of Innovation, formulas, four basic types of Innovation, and seven types of innovation profiling: the innovation profiling framework. We have explained this research roadmap so that readers will know and understand the research process we are doing. It is very important because producing something must have a strong concept. What is produced can be more structured, systematic and on target in its application, especially smart city profiling.

Full Text:

Pdf

References


T. Graziano, “Smart technologies, back-to-the-village rhetoric, and tactical urbanism: Post-covid planning scenarios in Italy,” Int. J. E-Planning Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 80–93, 2021, DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa7.

S. Mozūriūnaitė and J. Sabaitytė, “To what extent we do understand smart cities and characteristics influencing city smartness,” J. Archit. Urban., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, DOI: 10.3846/jau.2021.12392.

A. Stenberg, “What does Innovation mean-a a term without a clear definition," p. 2, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1064843/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

M. Mehta, A. Chandani, and B. Neeraja, “Creativity and Innovation: Assurance for Growth,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 804–811, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00244-5.

H. Boer and W. E. During, "Innovation, what Innovation? a comparison between product, process and organizational Innovation," Int. J. Technol. Manag., vol. 22, no. 1–3, pp. 83–107, 2001, DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2001.002956.

P. López-Rubio, N. Roig-Tierno, and A. Mas-Tur, “Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems,” Int. J. Qual. Innov., vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, DOI: 10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x.

T. H. Aas, N. Jentoft, and M. Vasstrøm, “Managing innovation of care services: An exploration of Norwegian municipalities,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2016.1215762.

B. Surya, F. Menne, H. Sabhan, S. Suriani, H. Abubakar, and M. Idris, “Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and Open Innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 20, 2021, DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7010020.

D. Šulyová, M. Gabryšová, and J. Vodák, “Smart Innovations as Accelerators for SMEs in Rural Areas,” in SHS Web of Conferences, 2021, vol. 90, p. 01021, DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20219001021.

S. R. de Oliveira Sousa, W. V. da Silva, C. P. da Veiga, and R. R. Zanini, “Theoretical background of innovation in services in small and medium-sized enterprises: literature mapping,” J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, DOI: 10.1186/s13731-020-00135-3.

S. Myeong, Y. Kim, and M. J. Ahn, “Smart City Strategies—Technology Push or Culture Pull? A Case Study Exploration of Gimpo and Namyangju, South Korea,” Smart Cities (MDPI), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/smartcities4010003.

A. Iqbal and S. Olariu, “A Survey of Enabling Technologies for Smart Communities,” Smart Cities, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 54–77, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/smartcities4010004.

F. Gerli, V. Chiodo, and I. Bengo, “Technology transfer for social entrepreneurship: Designing problem-oriented innovation ecosystems,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2021, DOI: 10.3390/su13010020.

C. Cantuarias-Villessuzanne, R. Weigel, and J. Blain, "Clustering of smart European cities to understand the cities' sustainability strategies," Sustain., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2021, DOI: 10.3390/su13020513.

A. Nurhindarto and I. Gamayanto, “Developing Smart City 5 . 0 Framework to Produce Competency,” J. Appl. Intell. Syst., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v5i6.190

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.







Jumlah Kunjungan:

View My Stats

Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By: